On the fifth anniversary of the day that changed everything, I planned my month to be home. In past years I had either forgotten about the upcoming 9/11, or it didn't factor too highly in my planning, but this year, it just seemed different.
I had never imagined that my life and the lives of my children would be defined by war, but that seems to be the case. I've certainly changed at work--taken a pay cut, lost most of my retirement, and have taken other changes that I won't get into. I think Son #1 is entertaining a career in the NSA. Daughter #1 is on track to marry a guy from the Air Force Academy. Daughter #2 is active in her high school's UN club, and has a copy of The Qu'ran on the breakfast table as I write. Never in a million years would I imagine any of these things, but they are real, none-the-less.
I spent 9/11/06 just about like I had wanted to...with the people who mean everything to me. I made a sack lunch for Daughter #2, spoke with Son #1 as much as he's able to manage in the morning, finished some chores around the house that needed attention, helped out Mrs. Azlib on some of her work, went to a financial planner (finally!), and was able to briefly see Daughter #1 at ASU.
Anyway, I don't mean to offer something significant...just that being home was important this year, and it worked out well.
Monday, September 11, 2006
Sunday, September 10, 2006
Thin skins...
The Democrats are upset at what they perceive as inaccuracies in ABC's The Path to 9/11. So upset that they've forced ABC to alter the show.
One is left wondering where this concern for accuracy was when Michael Moore was selectively telling his stories (e.g. 1, e.g. 2.)
One is also left wondering just how credible any complaints about accuracy are from a guy who admits lying about his theft of classified documents from the National Archives and another guy who would defend the sexual abuse of a subordinate with a quibble regarding the definition of "is".
Update: No sooner do I pen the above (Honest. I wrote mine before I went anywhere else.), than I click over to Chris Muir and see his take. Someone with far more impact than I might say: "Heh".
One is left wondering where this concern for accuracy was when Michael Moore was selectively telling his stories (e.g. 1, e.g. 2.)
One is also left wondering just how credible any complaints about accuracy are from a guy who admits lying about his theft of classified documents from the National Archives and another guy who would defend the sexual abuse of a subordinate with a quibble regarding the definition of "is".
Update: No sooner do I pen the above (Honest. I wrote mine before I went anywhere else.), than I click over to Chris Muir and see his take. Someone with far more impact than I might say: "Heh".
Monday, September 04, 2006
Missed this anniversary....
I should have remembered this anniversary. It will happen here one day, in some fashion.
So, Who's to Blame for This?
For many years, on the three-day weekends of the summer, we have seen the media cover stories on how high gas prices were. We see the stories about travel plans changed, how people are chosing to stay home rather than get away, and how the airlines and hotels are suffering because people can't or won't pay what it takes to travel.Yet no (or at least, few) such stories are floating about on this Labor Day weekend. Gas prices are as low as I've seen in some time. In Houston (and I suspect many more locations), gas prices actually fell prior to the weekend.
More importantly, just how are the Democrats going to blame Bush for this?
Tuesday, August 29, 2006
Clash of Civilizations...
Not that I claim this idea as mine, because I don't. In fact, I first heard it expressed by Tom Friedman--a guy I usually disagree with. However, we are in a Clash of Civilizations. A war of the worst type--a religious war. On one side are the Islamofacists. And on the other are Those-who-worship-Freedom.
So I present here another post making this same point. And Van der Leun believes that we will have to get hit again hard to make us all understand what we're facing.
I again am in complete agreement with Van der Leun when he says...
Update: Links now updated, and Chris Muir is added too!
So I present here another post making this same point. And Van der Leun believes that we will have to get hit again hard to make us all understand what we're facing.
On September 11, the agents of Radical Islam began their attempt to destroy Freedom by attacking it at its core. The reaction of Freedom to this assault has been, once you consider the destructive power of the weapons systems it possesses, measured, deliberate and cautious. This is because Freedom, although sorely wounded, does not yet feel that its very existence is threatened. A more serious attack at any time in the future will put paid to that specious notion.
I again am in complete agreement with Van der Leun when he says...
What we must seek is not merely the "control" and "containment" of terror, for terror in this guise cannot be controlled or contained. We must come to the deeper understanding that only a complete victory over the global Radical Islamic forces can prevent the onset of a confrontation more terrible than the current war.My signature line at The High Road is...
I do not wish for Peace with our Enemies.Anyway, I encourage a trip over to The American Digest. [Note to self: Update the links!]
We did not create our enemies--they created themselves.
What I really want is Victory over our Enemies.
Update: Links now updated, and Chris Muir is added too!
Sunday, August 27, 2006
Saturday, August 26, 2006
Thursday, August 24, 2006
The Elites have it all wrong...
The elite in this country--the media, academia, many pundits--have it all wrong. Americans, by and large, approve of our military and what we're doing.
Case in point...
Yesterday in Savannah, we arrived at the gate to see a wife and two teenage daughters waiting to greet their hero home from the war. [How they were able to get inside security for this event is another story. However, I digress.] They'd made posters and carried American flags. They even went to the trouble to distribute smaller American flags to the crowd.
As the Navy Captain, in desert camo, came into the terminal from the jetway, a great round of applause broke out and those with flags waved them enthusiastically. Hugs and tears were exchanged between the separated family members, and the tears spread to the crowd.
Case in point...
Yesterday in Savannah, we arrived at the gate to see a wife and two teenage daughters waiting to greet their hero home from the war. [How they were able to get inside security for this event is another story. However, I digress.] They'd made posters and carried American flags. They even went to the trouble to distribute smaller American flags to the crowd.
As the Navy Captain, in desert camo, came into the terminal from the jetway, a great round of applause broke out and those with flags waved them enthusiastically. Hugs and tears were exchanged between the separated family members, and the tears spread to the crowd.
Thursday, August 17, 2006
Grand Canyon...
One of the best movies I've ever seen is Grand Canyon. The theme is that we're often faced with very bad circumstances in our life, which will suprisingly lead to something very good (and vice-versa). As you're in the middle of what you think is the worst thing possible, something really great is just around the corner.
In that vein, the war in Iraq, and more broadly, the War on Terror looks to be in bad shape. About the best thing one can say about Iraq is that we're in a stalemate. The sectarian fighting does have the potential to descend Iraq into a civil war. No one seems to be willing to effectively confront Iran. Hezbollah, while having been pounded more than they're admitting, did hold off long enough to claim victory over Israel. It all appears to be headed in the wrong direction.
I'm not the only one with this view. My main guys are feeling it too. So, what an inspiration it was to read in the comments to one of their posts...
Thank you, brentbo.
In that vein, the war in Iraq, and more broadly, the War on Terror looks to be in bad shape. About the best thing one can say about Iraq is that we're in a stalemate. The sectarian fighting does have the potential to descend Iraq into a civil war. No one seems to be willing to effectively confront Iran. Hezbollah, while having been pounded more than they're admitting, did hold off long enough to claim victory over Israel. It all appears to be headed in the wrong direction.
I'm not the only one with this view. My main guys are feeling it too. So, what an inspiration it was to read in the comments to one of their posts...
"THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly...."
Thank you, brentbo.
Wednesday, August 02, 2006
The Electoral College...
I've been a fan of the New York Sun for about a year now. It is a smallish, mostly conservative newspaper that I pick up while on layovers in NYC. I enjoy their reporting and editorial slant. It should not have to be said that I've given up completely on the New York Times--I won't even grab one off a seat somewhere.
The other day, I picked up a Sun which had an article on their front page on an effort among New York state legislators to "curb the Electoral College". Many in blue states cannot help but remember that the 2000 presidential election had Bush winning the electoral vote, but Gore winning the popular vote, and they want to "correct" that. They are entirely disingenuous, however, when they openly admit that this is an attempt "...to establish a popular vote system without a constitutional amendment, which requires the support of two-thirds of Congress and 38 states...." In other words, find a way around the clear meaning of the Constitution because, you know, it's unlikely that they would actually succeed in amending it.
The supporters of this movement miss the obvious: The interests of those in urban coastal cities are often very different than the interests of other voters. They are entirely locked into their arrogance that Big States=Smart States that they are proposing a change which might result in case where the voters of "as few as 11 of the most populous states" might determine the Presidency.
Who cares the wishes of all those hicks in the South, the hayseeds in those flyover states, and all those rubes in those big square states that nobody can name? We've been to Haaavad; We've marched in Berkeley. We know better than them who ought to be President.
The other day, I picked up a Sun which had an article on their front page on an effort among New York state legislators to "curb the Electoral College". Many in blue states cannot help but remember that the 2000 presidential election had Bush winning the electoral vote, but Gore winning the popular vote, and they want to "correct" that. They are entirely disingenuous, however, when they openly admit that this is an attempt "...to establish a popular vote system without a constitutional amendment, which requires the support of two-thirds of Congress and 38 states...." In other words, find a way around the clear meaning of the Constitution because, you know, it's unlikely that they would actually succeed in amending it.
The supporters of this movement miss the obvious: The interests of those in urban coastal cities are often very different than the interests of other voters. They are entirely locked into their arrogance that Big States=Smart States that they are proposing a change which might result in case where the voters of "as few as 11 of the most populous states" might determine the Presidency.
Who cares the wishes of all those hicks in the South, the hayseeds in those flyover states, and all those rubes in those big square states that nobody can name? We've been to Haaavad; We've marched in Berkeley. We know better than them who ought to be President.
Saturday, July 29, 2006
Tony Blair....
Tony Blair, that famously liberal Friend of Bill, has become one of the best friends that this country has ever had. He was never better than at the joint press conference the other day....
h/t ranting profs
...I don't think, actually, it's anything to do with a loss of American influence at all. I think -- we've got to go back and ask what changed policy, because policy has changed in the past few years. And what changed policy was September the 11th. That changed policy, but actually, before September the 11th this global movement with a global ideology was already in being. September the 11th was the culmination of what they wanted to do. But, actually -- and this is probably where the policymakers, such as myself, were truly in error -- is that even before September the 11th, this was happening in all sorts of different ways in different countries.
I mean, in Algeria, for example, tens and tens of thousands of people lost their lives. This movement has grown, it is there, it will latch on to any cause that it possibly can and give it a dimension of terrorism and hatred. You can see this. You can see it in Kashmir, for example. You can see it in Chechnya. You can see it in Palestine.
Now, what is its purpose? Its purpose is to promote its ideology based upon the perversion of Islam, and to use any methods at all, but particularly terrorism, to do that, because they know that the value of terrorism to them is -- as I was saying a moment or two ago, it's not simply the act of terror, it's the chain reaction that terror brings with it. Terrorism brings the reprisal; the reprisal brings the additional hatred; the additional hatred breeds the additional terrorism, and so on. But in a small way, we lived through that in Northern Ireland over many, many decades.
Now, what happened after September the 11th -- and this explains, I think, the President's policy, but also the reason why I have taken the view, and still take the view that Britain and America should remain strong allies, shoulder-to-shoulder in fighting this battle, is that we are never going to succeed unless we understand they are going to fight hard. The reason why they are doing what they're doing in Iraq at the moment -- and, yes, it's really tough as a result of it -- is because they know that if, right in the center of the Middle East, in an Arab, Muslim country, you've got a non-sectarian democracy, in other words people weren't governed either by religious fanatics or secular dictators, you've got a genuine democracy of the people, how does their ideology flourish in such circumstances?
So they have imported the terrorism into that country, preyed on whatever reactionary elements there are to boost it. And that's why we have the issue there; that's why the Taliban are trying to come back in Afghanistan. That is why, the moment it looked as if you could get progress in Israel and Palestine, it had to be stopped. That's the moment when, as they saw there was a problem in Gaza, so they realized, well, there's a possibility now we can set Lebanon against Israel.
Now, it's a global movement, it's a global ideology. And if there's any mistake that's ever made in these circumstances, it's if people are surprised that it's tough to fight, because you're up against an ideology that's prepared to use any means at all, including killing any number of wholly innocent people.
And I don't dispute part of the implication of your question at all, in the sense that you look at what is happening in the Middle East and what is happening in Iraq and Lebanon and Palestine, and, of course, there's a sense of shock and frustration and anger at what is happening, and grief at the loss of innocent lives. But it is not a reason for walking away. It's a reason for staying the course, and staying it no matter how tough it is, because the alternative is actually letting this ideology grip a larger and larger number of people.
And it is going to be difficult. Look, we've got a problem even in our own Muslim communities in Europe, who will half-buy into some of the propaganda that's pushed at it -- the purpose of America is to suppress Islam, Britain has joined with America in the suppression of Islam. And one of the things we've got to stop doing is stop apologizing for our own positions. Muslims in America, as far as I'm aware of, are free to worship; Muslims in Britain are free to worship. We are plural societies.
It's nonsense, the propaganda is nonsense. And we're not going to defeat this ideology until we in the West go out with sufficient confidence in our own position and say, this is wrong. It's not just wrong in its methods, it's wrong in its ideas, it's wrong in its ideology, it's wrong in every single wretched reactionary thing about it. And it will be a long struggle, I'm afraid. But there's no alternative but to stay the course with it. And we will....
h/t ranting profs
Saturday, July 22, 2006
Gun Locks....
While not a bad idea on paper, do have their drawbacks.
Azlib. Axiom #47: Kids need to know how to safely handle a gun before they know how to multiply.
h/t FrankJ.
Azlib. Axiom #47: Kids need to know how to safely handle a gun before they know how to multiply.
h/t FrankJ.
But It's a Dry Heat...
While on a trip a couple of days ago, I got a rather frantic call from Mrs. Azlib in the middle of the night. It seems the filter for the spa had a giant hole in it. Water and D.E. was spewing everywhere and the spa had drained completely. I told her how to turn off the pump motor and what to do to keep it from coming on again.
So, yesterday morning was my day to repair said hole. It turned out to be much easier than I had imagined, and about as expensive. That said, it was a bit time consuming.
And it was very hot. The paper this morning said 118°. It hasn't been that hot in a decade. There have been only ten instances when it got that hot since they've been keeping records. Hot. Real Hot.
So, as I look back at yesterday, it's no wonder that I had to wear gloves to handle the tools and I was beginning to get light-headed.
Today--more of the same. Primarily to stay home to care for Mrs. Azlib after her colonoscopy, but also because of the heat, I'm not going to make it to the IDPA match this afternoon.
So, yesterday morning was my day to repair said hole. It turned out to be much easier than I had imagined, and about as expensive. That said, it was a bit time consuming.
And it was very hot. The paper this morning said 118°. It hasn't been that hot in a decade. There have been only ten instances when it got that hot since they've been keeping records. Hot. Real Hot.
So, as I look back at yesterday, it's no wonder that I had to wear gloves to handle the tools and I was beginning to get light-headed.
Today--more of the same. Primarily to stay home to care for Mrs. Azlib after her colonoscopy, but also because of the heat, I'm not going to make it to the IDPA match this afternoon.
Tuesday, July 18, 2006
Dogs and Cats lying together....
With a hat-tip to the WSJ Best of the Web...
From The Kuwaiti Arab Times...
And there you have it....Arab Muslims endorsing the actions of Israeli Jews.
From The Kuwaiti Arab Times...
A battle between supporters and opponents of these adventurers has begun, starting from Palestine to Tehran passing through Syria and Lebanon. This war was inevitable as the Lebanese government couldn't bring Hezbollah within its authority and make it work for the interests of Lebanon. Similarly leader of the Palestinian Authority Mahmoud Abbas has been unable to rein in the Hamas Movement.
Unfortunately we must admit that in such a war the only way to get rid of "these irregular phenomena" is what Israel is doing. The operations of Israel in Gaza and Lebanon are in the interest of people of Arab countries and the international community.
And there you have it....Arab Muslims endorsing the actions of Israeli Jews.
Wednesday, July 05, 2006
The Norks...
So, the North Koreans have tested their missile on our Independence Day. They are obviously demonstrating an inferiority complex, but beyond that, every time they pull one of these stunts, I cannot help but flash to this guy...
Independence Day was, perhaps, a prophetic day to hold this test. The day is not just an anniversary, but also a movie. And in that movie, the President is also a former fighter-pilot.
Am I the only one who can't help but think of this guy?
And, to bring this thing full circle, is this image that far off?
Update: The Norks are now robbing trains. Not these kind of train-robbers; More like stealing the whole damned train.
h/t Frank J.
Independence Day was, perhaps, a prophetic day to hold this test. The day is not just an anniversary, but also a movie. And in that movie, the President is also a former fighter-pilot.
Am I the only one who can't help but think of this guy?
And, to bring this thing full circle, is this image that far off?
Update: The Norks are now robbing trains. Not these kind of train-robbers; More like stealing the whole damned train.
h/t Frank J.
Tuesday, July 04, 2006
The Mid-East...A Tangled Mess
I ran across this item in this morning's paper.
President Mubarak of Egypt travels to Saudi Arabia to meet the King to encourage him to use his influence with Syria to get them to pressure Hamas (funded largely by Iran) to reach across to the Palestinians now at the end of their rope.
Does anybody really believe this knot can be untangled?
President Mubarak of Egypt travels to Saudi Arabia to meet the King to encourage him to use his influence with Syria to get them to pressure Hamas (funded largely by Iran) to reach across to the Palestinians now at the end of their rope.
Does anybody really believe this knot can be untangled?
Bush at Ft. Bragg...
Today, Pres. Bush spoke at an Independence Day appearance at Ft. Bragg. He couldn't have put up a more clear description of why we are at war. I'm hoping that someone puts it up on you tube.
Monday, July 03, 2006
The Civil Debate from the Left...
If kos [Sorry. No link from me. Look it up yourself if you're really interested.] strikes you as a bit too screechy, you can always sign on with the deeper debate found here.
h/t. Ann Althouse
h/t. Ann Althouse
Sunday, July 02, 2006
Saturday, July 01, 2006
Friday, June 30, 2006
Al Gore--Moonbat
In preface, apologies offered for the poor quality and the inclusion of commercials.
But some highlights...
"Global warming is more damaging that nuclear winter" (paraphrased)
"I think I carried Florida"
"the vitriol is coming from the right"
Part 1....
Part 2....
Even though Gore is an idiot, he can be a good sport though...
h/t allahpundit
But some highlights...
"Global warming is more damaging that nuclear winter" (paraphrased)
"I think I carried Florida"
"the vitriol is coming from the right"
Part 1....
Part 2....
Even though Gore is an idiot, he can be a good sport though...
h/t allahpundit
Political Polling...
With busy months of March and April, I had gotten behind on some reading I like to keep up with and I recently caught a rather-dated item in the Washington Whispers column of June 5 issue of USNews...
So, as we all now know, Bilbray defeated Busby to the tune of 49%-45%. The seat remains in the control of the Republicans and reflects the district.
A couple of questions pop to mind...
*Was the polling that the NRCC used to initially predict a loss so inaccurate that they genuinely believed they were going to lose?
*How much difference did the money differential make in keeping this seat?
*Does this USNWR article amount to political dis-information?
I take it for granted that much of the press is locked into the meme that the Repulicans are in trouble in November. The WaPo article linked to above obviously cannot divorce itself from the idea, even while having to report a Republican win. However, I am finding it increasingly difficult to take polling available to the public very seriously at all. With everyone having an agenda related to the polling, their meaning falls apart.
GOP Fears in a Bellwether Race
Staffers from the National Republican Congressional Committee are quietly telling GOP House members to prepare for a possible loss in the June 6 special election to fill the seat of Randy "Duke" Cunningham, now in prison for taking bribes. The Southern California district is heavily Republican, but some GOP insiders believe that Democrat Francine Busby will defeat former GOP Rep. Brian Bilbray and go on to win a full term in November. More alarming some worry that a Bilbray defeat could signal the GOP's loss of control of the House. The NRCC has already pumped $3.1 million into the race. "It is becoming more and more likely," says one GOP strategist, "that Bilbray will squeak out a victory." But another longtime Republican operative isn't so sure. "This is a district we should never lose," he says. "It's the stink of Cunningham, and the Bush problem."
So, as we all now know, Bilbray defeated Busby to the tune of 49%-45%. The seat remains in the control of the Republicans and reflects the district.
A couple of questions pop to mind...
*Was the polling that the NRCC used to initially predict a loss so inaccurate that they genuinely believed they were going to lose?
*How much difference did the money differential make in keeping this seat?
*Does this USNWR article amount to political dis-information?
I take it for granted that much of the press is locked into the meme that the Repulicans are in trouble in November. The WaPo article linked to above obviously cannot divorce itself from the idea, even while having to report a Republican win. However, I am finding it increasingly difficult to take polling available to the public very seriously at all. With everyone having an agenda related to the polling, their meaning falls apart.
Saturday, June 24, 2006
IDPA Range Report...
So last month's report was all about the fun of the BUG match.
This month's report will focus on dedication--as in just who will show up on a Saturday afternoon in June for the IDPA match. 108° under cloudy skies. It's beginning to get humid and I just wish it would rain already!
As you might expect, the turnout was very small--maybe 14 guys. The setup this month was, thankfully, light--four stages, one of which included two strings. I shot with two very experienced shooters and a guy new to IDPA, but experienced in shooting and he was looking for IDPA pointers.
Anyway, the highlight of the match occured before I even got out of the truck. The Rio Saldo Sportsmans Club is now in possession of their second helicopter. Yes, you've got that right folks. Not prop helicopters. Real frikkin' helicopters.
And here is the proof (apologies for the crappy cell-phone camera, but you know. Whatever)...
This month's report will focus on dedication--as in just who will show up on a Saturday afternoon in June for the IDPA match. 108° under cloudy skies. It's beginning to get humid and I just wish it would rain already!
As you might expect, the turnout was very small--maybe 14 guys. The setup this month was, thankfully, light--four stages, one of which included two strings. I shot with two very experienced shooters and a guy new to IDPA, but experienced in shooting and he was looking for IDPA pointers.
Anyway, the highlight of the match occured before I even got out of the truck. The Rio Saldo Sportsmans Club is now in possession of their second helicopter. Yes, you've got that right folks. Not prop helicopters. Real frikkin' helicopters.
And here is the proof (apologies for the crappy cell-phone camera, but you know. Whatever)...
Friday, June 23, 2006
Wednesday, June 21, 2006
Which Party is Better for Labor?
Although I am a card-carrying union member, I am not much of a unionist. Unions are essentially socialist organizations, and I am too much of a believer in capitalism and the free-market to be a die-hard union guy. Unions have their purpose, yet they often abuse that purpose.
So anyway, I was watching TV the other night and happened to flip through Jim Cramer's Mad Money show, and he finally was able to recommend an airline...Continental. Cramer's schtic is a bit hard to take, and I don't know enough about the markets and investing to know whether I agree with him or not, but Cramer does put on an "energetic" show. I've been unable to find a direct video link to this episode, but below is a similar episode (date unknown) where Cramer extols Walmart.
Here is a link to an article on Cramer's MM episode on Continental. The money (no pun intended) quote is...
Cramer is a Democrat.
On the other hand, Ben Stein observed way back in 2002 that one way to "ruin American Enterprise" would be to...
Stein, of course, is a Republican.
Now I have been very much a "small 'l'" libertarian since the Libertarian Party went nuts after 9/11, and the practical part of me understands that both major parties are much more alike than their rhetoric might suggest, but I can't help but wonder: Why does the myth persist that the working man benefits by electing a Democrat and that the rich are typically Republicans?
So anyway, I was watching TV the other night and happened to flip through Jim Cramer's Mad Money show, and he finally was able to recommend an airline...Continental. Cramer's schtic is a bit hard to take, and I don't know enough about the markets and investing to know whether I agree with him or not, but Cramer does put on an "energetic" show. I've been unable to find a direct video link to this episode, but below is a similar episode (date unknown) where Cramer extols Walmart.
Here is a link to an article on Cramer's MM episode on Continental. The money (no pun intended) quote is...
...In addition, airlines have cut unions. Cramer believes unions are beneficial and those who are pro-workers might not like the fact that the company doesn't have employee benefits, but he said the stock is not a long-term play. Hold it only until the Open Skies initiative goes through and then sell, he advised viewers. You'll be able to get out with big money, he said....So Cramer recommends investment in Walmart because they're doggedly fighting off any requirement (moral or otherwise) to provide employee healthcare plans, and he also recommends Continental because, in part, they've succeeded in pounding down their unions.
Cramer is a Democrat.
On the other hand, Ben Stein observed way back in 2002 that one way to "ruin American Enterprise" would be to...
Hold the managers of corporations to extremely lax standards of conduct and allow them to get off with a slap on the wrist when they betray the trust of shareholders.[In fairness, he added that another element of our road to ruin would be to "Hold the management of labor unions to no ethical standards."] Ben more recently castigated the ethical lapses of corporate managements here. He's also on record regarding the airline pensions which are now rapidly becoming the burden of the PBGC (itself perhaps on the road to failure).
...About three years ago, UAL was "forced" to enter bankruptcy to stay alive.
This step meant that UAL could drastically cut workers' pay — and it did. Pensions were simply jettisoned and made the burden of the federal government's Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, which meant cuts of close to two-thirds in some pilots' pension payments. And, of course, the bankruptcy simply eliminated all of that equity in UAL that the employees had bought with their hard-earned savings.
Thus, in a series of evil events, management of UAL basically ruined the lives of the employee-owners, if that is not putting too fine a point on it, by taking away their savings, incomes and pensions....
Stein, of course, is a Republican.
Now I have been very much a "small 'l'" libertarian since the Libertarian Party went nuts after 9/11, and the practical part of me understands that both major parties are much more alike than their rhetoric might suggest, but I can't help but wonder: Why does the myth persist that the working man benefits by electing a Democrat and that the rich are typically Republicans?
Thursday, June 15, 2006
Hey. This is sorta funny....
And because this has always been one of my favorites (I hope NBC doesn't pull it down.).....
Saturday, June 10, 2006
Young Americans....
Unless you work in a prison or a porn shop, the warning "May be NSFW" definitely applies. But hey, check out the trailer to this documentary anyway.
Sunday, June 04, 2006
Hey, Democrats...
Not that it isn't obvious to everyone that you've dropped your objections to the "NSA- Domestic Wiretapping Terrorist Surveillance" policy, but does anyone still believe that these policies are not paying dividends?
In discussing the international nature of the recent arrests of an Islamist cell alleged to planning to bomb a Canadian target, John over at Powerline points out...
How many bloviating (to use a favorite word of my least-favorite commentator) Democrats decried this program?
Hillary Clinton
Al Gore
John Kerry
Howard Dean
Well, you get the idea. Perhaps not in the mid-term elections this year, but certainly in the '08 Presidential race, this issue will become another albatross around the necks of Democrats.
In discussing the international nature of the recent arrests of an Islamist cell alleged to planning to bomb a Canadian target, John over at Powerline points out...
Hmm. Do you suppose that breaking up these terrorist gangs may have involved intercepting some international phone calls and emails?
How many bloviating (to use a favorite word of my least-favorite commentator) Democrats decried this program?
Hillary Clinton
Al Gore
John Kerry
Howard Dean
Well, you get the idea. Perhaps not in the mid-term elections this year, but certainly in the '08 Presidential race, this issue will become another albatross around the necks of Democrats.
Saturday, June 03, 2006
For no reason at all...
I think I'd just like to say--Is this a great country or what? If these two can become the successes that they are, what is to keep any of the rest of us back?
Friday, June 02, 2006
Thursday, June 01, 2006
Tuesday, May 30, 2006
Monday, May 29, 2006
9/11 Conspiracy...
The other day, on another forum, I used the example of some documentaries making the point that 9/11 was not what we all saw it to be as a reason that I take many documentaries with a large grain of salt.
And, today, I found that my favorite magicians, Penn and Teller have another bit up debunking these documentaries. Enjoy.
And, today, I found that my favorite magicians, Penn and Teller have another bit up debunking these documentaries. Enjoy.
Memorial Day....
I don't write well enough to put up a treatise on Memorial Day, nor well connected enough to write someone else's story, so I'll just Fly the Flag.
Sunday, May 28, 2006
Fun, Fun, Fun...
Yesterday I was able to get out to the monthly IDPA match. The theme this month was "Back Up Guns", so I brought out Mrs. Azlib's Walther PPK.
It's been forever since I last had that thing out to the range, and I had forgotten just how sweet that little gun is. Being the first guy up on the first stage, I was presented with one feed problem probably due to the stupid Blazer ammo I was trying to use up and a likely too-infrequently cleaned gun. [Grrrr.] But once I worked through that (and began to remember to flick off the safety on my draw), the thing ran like a champ. I've become accustomed to the stronger pulls required on my DAO
pistols and had forgotten how light a touch was necessary on the PPK.
My holster choices for this weapon were either IDPA-illegal, IDPA-stupid, or scary. I've got a nice SOB holster, but that's illegal at a match. The holster I most often carry this in is a cheap, suede IWB affair. It is OK to carry and draw from, but even two-handed re-holstering is almost impossible, so therefore not practical at an IDPA match. And I also have an ankle holster for the thing. I have exactly one pair of pants which are big enough at the ankle to allow me to pull up the fabric high enough to get to the gun. On the few times I've carried it in this ankle holster, I've always been concerned about the holster slipping down my leg, not to mention the extra time needed to get bent over my big gut should I actually have to get to the thing. So I went out and bought a fairly unimpressive OWB rig for the match. It worked, and it would conceal OK, but I really don't like it.
One of the fellas I shot with showed up with this thing. If there is a fanny-pack out there which does not completely shout "GUN! GUN! I'VE GOT A GUN IN THIS FANNY-PACK!!", then this has got to be it. [Note to self: Add this to a Father's Day wish-list.]
I ended up re-shooting Stage 1. It was set up as an encounter with one target where you shoot twice at arms-length range, then retreat diagonally for the remaining shots. Like everybody else, I initially used an isoceles stance for the first two shots and more of the same during the retreat. However, on my reshoot, I decided to shoot the first two shots from retention, then back up with the isoceles. I surprised myself at how well I did--meaning that I got the first two rounds pretty close to where I intended.
Ivan really put some thought into this match and it showed. The IDPA BUG rules are somewhat limiting, but he found a way to push the theme forward. He put up two stages where you shoot one weapon dry, then transition to another, and he provided the "other weapons". On one stage, you shot two targets with the final two rounds from Ivan's XD-45, then transitioned to your BUG in another diagonal retreat as you shot T3.
His other stage was to shoot 3 targets with your BUG as you moved towards a downed soldier with a M4. [Ivan's M4 is set up with a Reddot optic instead of the ACOG shown here, but otherwise very similar.] Grab the M4 and let loose with the last five rounds into T4 (full auto--naturally!!)
Regardless of how the scores turn out, it was fun. Fun. Fun. Tons o' Fun!!
It's been forever since I last had that thing out to the range, and I had forgotten just how sweet that little gun is. Being the first guy up on the first stage, I was presented with one feed problem probably due to the stupid Blazer ammo I was trying to use up and a likely too-infrequently cleaned gun. [Grrrr.] But once I worked through that (and began to remember to flick off the safety on my draw), the thing ran like a champ. I've become accustomed to the stronger pulls required on my DAO
pistols and had forgotten how light a touch was necessary on the PPK.
My holster choices for this weapon were either IDPA-illegal, IDPA-stupid, or scary. I've got a nice SOB holster, but that's illegal at a match. The holster I most often carry this in is a cheap, suede IWB affair. It is OK to carry and draw from, but even two-handed re-holstering is almost impossible, so therefore not practical at an IDPA match. And I also have an ankle holster for the thing. I have exactly one pair of pants which are big enough at the ankle to allow me to pull up the fabric high enough to get to the gun. On the few times I've carried it in this ankle holster, I've always been concerned about the holster slipping down my leg, not to mention the extra time needed to get bent over my big gut should I actually have to get to the thing. So I went out and bought a fairly unimpressive OWB rig for the match. It worked, and it would conceal OK, but I really don't like it.
One of the fellas I shot with showed up with this thing. If there is a fanny-pack out there which does not completely shout "GUN! GUN! I'VE GOT A GUN IN THIS FANNY-PACK!!", then this has got to be it. [Note to self: Add this to a Father's Day wish-list.]
I ended up re-shooting Stage 1. It was set up as an encounter with one target where you shoot twice at arms-length range, then retreat diagonally for the remaining shots. Like everybody else, I initially used an isoceles stance for the first two shots and more of the same during the retreat. However, on my reshoot, I decided to shoot the first two shots from retention, then back up with the isoceles. I surprised myself at how well I did--meaning that I got the first two rounds pretty close to where I intended.
Ivan really put some thought into this match and it showed. The IDPA BUG rules are somewhat limiting, but he found a way to push the theme forward. He put up two stages where you shoot one weapon dry, then transition to another, and he provided the "other weapons". On one stage, you shot two targets with the final two rounds from Ivan's XD-45, then transitioned to your BUG in another diagonal retreat as you shot T3.
His other stage was to shoot 3 targets with your BUG as you moved towards a downed soldier with a M4. [Ivan's M4 is set up with a Reddot optic instead of the ACOG shown here, but otherwise very similar.] Grab the M4 and let loose with the last five rounds into T4 (full auto--naturally!!) Regardless of how the scores turn out, it was fun. Fun. Fun. Tons o' Fun!!
Sunday, May 21, 2006
Just Wondering...
...On the weekend when the premiere of The DaVinci Code sparks all kinds of debate in Catholic and Christian communities on whether the film is blasphemous or just fiction, how might the Islamic world react in the same circumstance?
Tuesday, May 16, 2006
Illegal Immigration...
Since this is the crisis-du-jour, I guess I ought to put something up.
As I look at I.I., I'm left with one impression: Those who use the loudest voices in their positions are more wrong than anyone else--this is an issue where the moderates ought to prevail. This goes for the Minuteman/Tom Tancredo/Lou Dobbs position as well as the Si, Se Puede/Viva La Raza position. We have every right to protect our borders from any sort of incursion, be it economic, drug-related or military. However, we also need to recognize that we are a nation of immigrants and that the illegal immigrants now at issue are providing valuable services to America.
There is another set of snakes circling around this matter...politicians. They are pandering this issue like there's no tomorrow. My own Janet-Reno-Mini-Me Governor, Janet Napolitano, once said "Show me a 50-foot wall and I'll show you a 51-foot ladder". Now, she's all over the Bush proposal of putting the National Guard on the border to assist the Border Patrol on holding back the illegals. Of course, J.D. Hayworth can barely contain himself, what with his book out and all. And now Bush has fallen prey to the noise (to mix my metaphors) and will put up a token Guard force on the border.
So, what are their orders? Posse Commitatus probably enters here somewhere. Do the National Guard have any orders on lethal force against these illegal immigrants? Can the Guard defend themselves? Let's not rely on the idea that the Guard will be REMFs in purely supporting roles to the Border Patrol. They're there for a reason. Just what is their mission (beyond the public relations angle, at least)?
In the name of this public mass hysteria over I.I., we're embarking on a massive wall-building, Border Patrol build-up, and the politicians are scrambling over each other to see who can move to the furthest to the right the quickest. Just how different is this than the Berlin Wall? In terms of how much it costs to operate, does it really matter which direction the Guards are facing? One of my favorite blogs, Op-For [Note to self: Update the favorites!] once put up an entry with a parallel between what we did to the Soviets in the Cold War, and what al Queda is doing to us today. His point was that we "won" the Cold War by forcing the Soviets to do things that their economy couldn't stand. And now, in the combined (and confused) interests of Border Security controls Illegal Immigration, we're putting up the same sort of Wall that bankrupted the Soviets. Do we ever learn anything?
America has always had a shortage of labor here. From the days when indentured servants paid their way to get over here right up till today, there has always been a need for more labor. We've endured other immigrant waves (which today, are almost universally viewed to be "legal", but I'm not willing to concede that point). Germans, Italians, Irish, Chinese all flooded into this country seeking jobs that Americans decried at the time. Yet, somehow, we're all the better for it. And, surprisingly, after all these immigrant waves, we're still speaking English. I confess I don't understand why the "Mexican" Illegal Immigration Wave we're now in the middle of will turn out any differently.
I'm wondering just how many of the "Build-the-Wall" types have thought about just how expensive it would be to live off of American-only labor. How much would you have to pay an American kid to put down the PlayStation and go get a job picking lettuce? How much more would your house run--or said another way--How much less house could you afford to live in today if it was Americans who had built it?
The Pro-Immigrant marches in mid April and on May Day may have backfired. They left the impression among the majority here that the I.I.'s really didn't care about our laws. Talk Radio included one of the dumbest things I've ever heard...some college girl spouting off about how entire states of the West ought to be ceded back to Mexico. Then there was the "Boundaries without Borders" argument...to which I answer: "Huh? WTF are you talking about?"
Here is where I stand on Illegal Immigration...We are far better off by having these illegal immigrants here than we would be if we kicked them all out. Mexico and the other Central and South American countries sending us their labor are far poorer by having their ambitious and industrious people leave their homes to work here.
I think the real answer lies underneath the complaints many here have on I.I. and it is an example of needing to be careful what you ask for. The main complaint is that the I.I.'s burden our schools, healthcare and don't pay taxes. Firstly--they do pay taxes and they often get far less of a return on those paid taxes than Americans do. Yet if I.I. presence in our tax-paid schools and healthcare is such a problem, I say get rid of tax-paid schools and healthcare. Make them entirely private. The free market will quickly find a way to deliver these services to Americans, and probably at a lower cost than the .gov delivers them to us.
As I look at I.I., I'm left with one impression: Those who use the loudest voices in their positions are more wrong than anyone else--this is an issue where the moderates ought to prevail. This goes for the Minuteman/Tom Tancredo/Lou Dobbs position as well as the Si, Se Puede/Viva La Raza position. We have every right to protect our borders from any sort of incursion, be it economic, drug-related or military. However, we also need to recognize that we are a nation of immigrants and that the illegal immigrants now at issue are providing valuable services to America.
There is another set of snakes circling around this matter...politicians. They are pandering this issue like there's no tomorrow. My own Janet-Reno-Mini-Me Governor, Janet Napolitano, once said "Show me a 50-foot wall and I'll show you a 51-foot ladder". Now, she's all over the Bush proposal of putting the National Guard on the border to assist the Border Patrol on holding back the illegals. Of course, J.D. Hayworth can barely contain himself, what with his book out and all. And now Bush has fallen prey to the noise (to mix my metaphors) and will put up a token Guard force on the border.
So, what are their orders? Posse Commitatus probably enters here somewhere. Do the National Guard have any orders on lethal force against these illegal immigrants? Can the Guard defend themselves? Let's not rely on the idea that the Guard will be REMFs in purely supporting roles to the Border Patrol. They're there for a reason. Just what is their mission (beyond the public relations angle, at least)?
In the name of this public mass hysteria over I.I., we're embarking on a massive wall-building, Border Patrol build-up, and the politicians are scrambling over each other to see who can move to the furthest to the right the quickest. Just how different is this than the Berlin Wall? In terms of how much it costs to operate, does it really matter which direction the Guards are facing? One of my favorite blogs, Op-For [Note to self: Update the favorites!] once put up an entry with a parallel between what we did to the Soviets in the Cold War, and what al Queda is doing to us today. His point was that we "won" the Cold War by forcing the Soviets to do things that their economy couldn't stand. And now, in the combined (and confused) interests of Border Security controls Illegal Immigration, we're putting up the same sort of Wall that bankrupted the Soviets. Do we ever learn anything?
America has always had a shortage of labor here. From the days when indentured servants paid their way to get over here right up till today, there has always been a need for more labor. We've endured other immigrant waves (which today, are almost universally viewed to be "legal", but I'm not willing to concede that point). Germans, Italians, Irish, Chinese all flooded into this country seeking jobs that Americans decried at the time. Yet, somehow, we're all the better for it. And, surprisingly, after all these immigrant waves, we're still speaking English. I confess I don't understand why the "Mexican" Illegal Immigration Wave we're now in the middle of will turn out any differently.
I'm wondering just how many of the "Build-the-Wall" types have thought about just how expensive it would be to live off of American-only labor. How much would you have to pay an American kid to put down the PlayStation and go get a job picking lettuce? How much more would your house run--or said another way--How much less house could you afford to live in today if it was Americans who had built it?
The Pro-Immigrant marches in mid April and on May Day may have backfired. They left the impression among the majority here that the I.I.'s really didn't care about our laws. Talk Radio included one of the dumbest things I've ever heard...some college girl spouting off about how entire states of the West ought to be ceded back to Mexico. Then there was the "Boundaries without Borders" argument...to which I answer: "Huh? WTF are you talking about?"
Here is where I stand on Illegal Immigration...We are far better off by having these illegal immigrants here than we would be if we kicked them all out. Mexico and the other Central and South American countries sending us their labor are far poorer by having their ambitious and industrious people leave their homes to work here.
I think the real answer lies underneath the complaints many here have on I.I. and it is an example of needing to be careful what you ask for. The main complaint is that the I.I.'s burden our schools, healthcare and don't pay taxes. Firstly--they do pay taxes and they often get far less of a return on those paid taxes than Americans do. Yet if I.I. presence in our tax-paid schools and healthcare is such a problem, I say get rid of tax-paid schools and healthcare. Make them entirely private. The free market will quickly find a way to deliver these services to Americans, and probably at a lower cost than the .gov delivers them to us.
Sunday, May 14, 2006
This is why God invented the internet...
To allow laymen the ability to make clear something that the press will or can not.
The current crisis-du-jour in the Bush administration is the phone call data that the NSA got from 3 major phone service providers. Note: Although the press is doing their damnedest to avoid explicitly making this point, no one here is claiming that any phone calls have been listened to.
However, here, Kim du Toit explains in perfect pitch just exactly what is going on here. Please read it.
The current crisis-du-jour in the Bush administration is the phone call data that the NSA got from 3 major phone service providers. Note: Although the press is doing their damnedest to avoid explicitly making this point, no one here is claiming that any phone calls have been listened to.
However, here, Kim du Toit explains in perfect pitch just exactly what is going on here. Please read it.
Tuesday, May 09, 2006
Now this is interesting...
I sometimes take some time to go over just who is reading my stuff. And some weeks, I make it into the tens of readers [Instapundit--watch your six, buddy!].
So what should a poor, and crappy blogger as myself make of a ping from somebody like this?
So what should a poor, and crappy blogger as myself make of a ping from somebody like this?
Guess who said...
“Never for the sake of peace and quiet deny your convictions.”
Ronald Reagan?
Nope.
Jimmy Carter?
Nope. [One would hope this would be obvious.]
George Bush?
Nope.
John Kerry?
Nope. [Ditto.]
John Bolton?
Nope. [But you're getting close.]
Since I don't know how to format a "Continue Reading" link, I'll put the answer in the comments.
Monday, May 08, 2006
Hey! Does anybody else remember this guy???
This morning President Bush will nominate Air Force General Michael Hayden, now the head of the National Security Agency, to replace Porter Goss as head of the Central Intelligence Agency, who has resigned/been fired from that position.
This article typifies much of the opposition to Gen. Hayden--essentially that a military officer shouldn't head a civilian agency.
Question: Does anybody else remember this guy? Wasn't he a military guy at the head of a civilian agency? Doesn't his background include much more of the warfighter military stereotype than does Hayden's?
I think the Democrats know that they'll lose if they oppose Hayden on the point that he was in charge at the NSA when the NSA "Warrantless Surveillance" program was instituted. It appears that the Democrats are instead grasping for the straw that too much military leadership leads to the erosion of liberties. They're hoping that we've forgotten past military leaders of the CIA, and that we're still very much in a war.
This article typifies much of the opposition to Gen. Hayden--essentially that a military officer shouldn't head a civilian agency.
Question: Does anybody else remember this guy? Wasn't he a military guy at the head of a civilian agency? Doesn't his background include much more of the warfighter military stereotype than does Hayden's?
I think the Democrats know that they'll lose if they oppose Hayden on the point that he was in charge at the NSA when the NSA "Warrantless Surveillance" program was instituted. It appears that the Democrats are instead grasping for the straw that too much military leadership leads to the erosion of liberties. They're hoping that we've forgotten past military leaders of the CIA, and that we're still very much in a war.
Wednesday, April 19, 2006
"From the Mouth of Hell to…the Utah of the Middle East"....
Now that Stephen has offered four links to Michael J. Totten's Middle East Journal, I finally got around to reading link number five. I do recommend it.
And, as usual, you'll never see this in the MSM.
And, as usual, you'll never see this in the MSM.
Busy, Busy, Busy...
Recurrent approaching, the household chores and projects are overwhelming me, working more and making less--blogging has taken a hit. I'll try to do better, but won't promise anything.
Thursday, April 06, 2006
Geez, I hate...
Putting up something from MSNBC.
But it is such a damned good story. Go ahead. Don't take my word for it. Read it.
H/T Bill over at INDC Journal.
But it is such a damned good story. Go ahead. Don't take my word for it. Read it.
H/T Bill over at INDC Journal.
Wednesday, April 05, 2006
Tuesday, April 04, 2006
Iranian Military Improvements...
So, the news recently is that the Iranians are announcing bold new weapons in their arsenal. The other day it was a 200mph underwater rocket. Not surprisingly, the Russians seem to have been the source.
Now, I don't know the first thing about warfare on the sea. I know enough about air warfare to know that I shouldn't comment too loudly. But the commenters to this blog entry tell me that this "new" Iranian weapon, while a threat, probably isn't the threat that Iran is painting it to be. While a murder/suicide is still a murder, you can't keep it up.
And today we find a story where Iran announces a new airborne threat. But is this really new? Or are the Iranians announcing something that has been around since the mid-60's? Does this photo look anything like this one?
WIG vehicles are not new. They may be new to the Iranians, and they certainly are intriguing to the public, but the fact that they haven't caught on in either military or civilian aviation is telling. While the Iranian super-fast torpedoes, and WIG vehicles are, in a word, laughable, Jane's Tim Ripley makes a wonderful point here which bears repeating...
Now, I don't know the first thing about warfare on the sea. I know enough about air warfare to know that I shouldn't comment too loudly. But the commenters to this blog entry tell me that this "new" Iranian weapon, while a threat, probably isn't the threat that Iran is painting it to be. While a murder/suicide is still a murder, you can't keep it up.
And today we find a story where Iran announces a new airborne threat. But is this really new? Or are the Iranians announcing something that has been around since the mid-60's? Does this photo look anything like this one?
WIG vehicles are not new. They may be new to the Iranians, and they certainly are intriguing to the public, but the fact that they haven't caught on in either military or civilian aviation is telling. While the Iranian super-fast torpedoes, and WIG vehicles are, in a word, laughable, Jane's Tim Ripley makes a wonderful point here which bears repeating...
"You don't actually need lots of weapons to close (the Strait of Hormuz), you just need lots of threats... "You don't even have to sink a ship, you just have to double the insurance rates (for shipping) and it has a knock on effect on the price of oil."
Monday, March 20, 2006
"He must get the death penalty."
Jeffrey Dahmer? Zacarias Moussaoui? Some cop-killer? A rapist-murderer?
Nope.
A guy who converted from Islam to Christianity.
Are even our Muslim friends incapable of tolerance towards others?
By the way, this isn't new. Do a Google/Yahoo search on "Muslim converts to Christianity" or some version thereof, and see that such a conversion is widely held in the Muslim world as a capital offense.
Nope.
A guy who converted from Islam to Christianity.
...The prosecutor, Abdul Wasi, said he had offered to drop the charges if Rahman converted back to Islam, but he refused.
"He would have been forgiven if he changed back. But he said he was a Christian and would always remain one," Wasi said. "We are Muslims, and becoming a Christian is against our laws. He must get the death penalty."
Are even our Muslim friends incapable of tolerance towards others?
By the way, this isn't new. Do a Google/Yahoo search on "Muslim converts to Christianity" or some version thereof, and see that such a conversion is widely held in the Muslim world as a capital offense.
Saturday, March 18, 2006
Is this cool or what?
This is really an update to this post, but I thought it warranted a post of it's own.
I was perusing the sitemeter list of the sometimes tens of readers that I get in a week, and found that someone had searched "gun nut". My post above popped up on page 6 of that search.
Aside from popping up on page 1 of that search, could that be any cooler?
Update to the Update: I also just found that someone searched "IDPA", and this post of mine showed up on page three of the Google blogsearch.
I was perusing the sitemeter list of the sometimes tens of readers that I get in a week, and found that someone had searched "gun nut". My post above popped up on page 6 of that search.
Aside from popping up on page 1 of that search, could that be any cooler?
Update to the Update: I also just found that someone searched "IDPA", and this post of mine showed up on page three of the Google blogsearch.
Victory over Peace...
Cliff May offers nothing I can disagree with here. (h/t Glenn--like he needs my help with traffic).
My signature line on The High Road is...
Maybe I should print up some t-shirts.
My signature line on The High Road is...
I do not wish for Peace with our Enemies.
We did not create our enemies--they created themselves.
What I really want is Victory over our Enemies.
Maybe I should print up some t-shirts.
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
Monday, March 06, 2006
Gotta Work on This...
I'm only 86% of a gun nut. [Like my wife didn't already know!]
h/t: Cowboy Blob
| NRA Member You are 86% of a gun nut! |
You have excellent skills in weapons handling. I could definetly trust you to cover my back. Matter of fact, you're probably packing right now! |
 |
My test tracked 1 variable How you compared to other people your age and gender:
|
| Link: The Gun Nut Test written by slayer1am on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test |
h/t: Cowboy Blob
Sunday, February 26, 2006
Another fine day...
Since I spent a full day retreiving our former-exchange student (and her luggage!) from her internship at DisneyWorld, I was able to get out to not just one, but two IDPA events.
In the morning, I went and was re-classified. However, I should say "classified again", as I shot the third stage of the IDPA classification absolutely horribly, so I re-shot it and ended up in the same classification as I've had for a year now. I improved from "horrible" to only "bad". Not my best morning, but hey, I got to shoot. [BTW, this is all in preperation for the State IDPA match, which I have yet to work out a kitchen-pass for.]
In the afternoon, I made it out to my range's monthly IDPA match. They had taken a couple of months off for scheduling issues, and it was good to get back at it. I shot much better, and am awaiting the results.
A bad day of shooting beats a good day of just about anything else.
Update: Classifier Match results are in. I'm worse than I thought. Silver lining: I should practice more.
Update: No kitchen pass for me. Family is in town. The entry money is an issue. And it's supposed to rain/drizzle anyway. I'll shoot next week either in the Tuesday PM match or on my own.
In the morning, I went and was re-classified. However, I should say "classified again", as I shot the third stage of the IDPA classification absolutely horribly, so I re-shot it and ended up in the same classification as I've had for a year now. I improved from "horrible" to only "bad". Not my best morning, but hey, I got to shoot. [BTW, this is all in preperation for the State IDPA match, which I have yet to work out a kitchen-pass for.]
In the afternoon, I made it out to my range's monthly IDPA match. They had taken a couple of months off for scheduling issues, and it was good to get back at it. I shot much better, and am awaiting the results.
A bad day of shooting beats a good day of just about anything else.
Update: Classifier Match results are in. I'm worse than I thought. Silver lining: I should practice more.
Update: No kitchen pass for me. Family is in town. The entry money is an issue. And it's supposed to rain/drizzle anyway. I'll shoot next week either in the Tuesday PM match or on my own.
Sunday, February 19, 2006
I'm repeating myself...
I've said before (most recently here) that The Officers Club contain some of the finest young minds on military and world affairs in the blogosphere.
So, if you're not already a regular over there, click here and begin your education.
So, if you're not already a regular over there, click here and begin your education.
Monday, February 13, 2006
Cheney shoots a guy...
Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot a lawyer while on a hunting trip in Texas over the weekend.
So, aside from all "Cheney shoots a lawyer" jokes looming on late-night TV, what is the MSM all up in arms about?
They're all upset over the fact that it took 22 hours for the White House to make this public. They're in high dungeon about the delay. Hmmmm. Anyone notice what might have been happening during these 22 hours? Hint1, Hint2, Hint3, Hint4. Is anyone surprised at a WH motivation to not disclose something embarassing when it will be be the most damaging? Isn't this Rule #1 of Public Disclosure?
And, showing off my comedy-writing cred's; Isn't it delicious that Cheney was hunting quail?
So, aside from all "Cheney shoots a lawyer" jokes looming on late-night TV, what is the MSM all up in arms about?
They're all upset over the fact that it took 22 hours for the White House to make this public. They're in high dungeon about the delay. Hmmmm. Anyone notice what might have been happening during these 22 hours? Hint1, Hint2, Hint3, Hint4. Is anyone surprised at a WH motivation to not disclose something embarassing when it will be be the most damaging? Isn't this Rule #1 of Public Disclosure?
And, showing off my comedy-writing cred's; Isn't it delicious that Cheney was hunting quail?
Sunday, February 12, 2006
Hey. March is just around the corner, isn't it?
Anyone want to guess at what might be happening in March? H/T: Captain Ed
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
Coretta Scott King...
I only watched a very small portion of the funeral for Coretta Scott King yesterday, so I can't speak to the whole thing. However, from what I did see, and the coverage the right side of the media has provided, here are a couple of small points that I may come back and address later more fully...
Jimmy Carter--Absolutely horrible. I used to respect his post-presidency, but since the War took us to Iraq, he's been horrible. Now more than ever.
Joseph Lowery--Simply egregious. His speech had almost nothing to do with Mrs. King. It was simply the same old DNC/NAACP pap used to bash Bush. A woman died. Some things transcend politics. Most of his words have no place in a funeral.
The Clintons--A more posturing, calculating couple could not be possible.
But to my main point here. Some of this may be taken as rather ugly....
As I think I've mentioned, I am an airline pilot for a major national airline. For the last 7 years, I've been a Captain. While it's certainly not routine, it is also not uncommon to run across celebrities on the plane. I can understand that a celebrity might view being locked in a tube with a public who may bother them is problematic. Sometimes, you simply don't want to talk, and a celebrity on a plane simply has no place to escape to.
For these reasons, my employer will often allow special treatment to celebrities--mainly in the form of finding a way for them to avoid the terminal. Celebrities often travel with an aide or family member who will act to shield the celebrity from the public. Again, I understand all this.
Now, to my thoughts on Mrs. King...
As a middle-aged white man, I can't say I'm all that familiar with Mrs. King. While I know that she's supported many civil rights causes throughout her life, I don't know of any writings or speeches she's given. She didn't refuse to give up her seat on a segregated bus. The impression I get from my distant perch is that her association with the MLK Center and participation in other civil rights movements were to act as more of a figurehead, than an activist. In short, I don't know of any direct or significant contributions she might have made to civil rights or anything else she might have felt were important. Her most significant achievement, to my knowledge, was to remind us that her husband had been assassinated.
In other words: She married well. Since her husband's assassination, she lived her life to remind us of that fact.
However, to my direct experience with Mrs. King...
I don't remember at all where we were going, but the agent told us that we'd have Mrs. King on board. She arrived and boarded from the ramp, where she'd been driven with police escort right to the plane. She and her aide sat in First Class, with the aide sitting on the aisle. [Tangentially, I've also had Jimmy Carter on a flight. He sat in Coach, and was a very humble passenger.] It was communicated to both myself and the flight attendants that she did not want to be spoken to, in any way. Any needs she might have would be communicated through her aide.
In other words: She didn't want The Help speaking to her at all. She was royalty, and commoners shouldn't speak unless spoken to.
And this is where my opinion gets real ugly...
I also got the impression that all of this were doubly so, if the commoner were white.
So, take that for what it's worth. I'm not a racist in any way. I just don't think she lived a life which warranted the eulogies of 4 Presidents at her funeral.
Jimmy Carter--Absolutely horrible. I used to respect his post-presidency, but since the War took us to Iraq, he's been horrible. Now more than ever.
Joseph Lowery--Simply egregious. His speech had almost nothing to do with Mrs. King. It was simply the same old DNC/NAACP pap used to bash Bush. A woman died. Some things transcend politics. Most of his words have no place in a funeral.
The Clintons--A more posturing, calculating couple could not be possible.
But to my main point here. Some of this may be taken as rather ugly....
As I think I've mentioned, I am an airline pilot for a major national airline. For the last 7 years, I've been a Captain. While it's certainly not routine, it is also not uncommon to run across celebrities on the plane. I can understand that a celebrity might view being locked in a tube with a public who may bother them is problematic. Sometimes, you simply don't want to talk, and a celebrity on a plane simply has no place to escape to.
For these reasons, my employer will often allow special treatment to celebrities--mainly in the form of finding a way for them to avoid the terminal. Celebrities often travel with an aide or family member who will act to shield the celebrity from the public. Again, I understand all this.
Now, to my thoughts on Mrs. King...
As a middle-aged white man, I can't say I'm all that familiar with Mrs. King. While I know that she's supported many civil rights causes throughout her life, I don't know of any writings or speeches she's given. She didn't refuse to give up her seat on a segregated bus. The impression I get from my distant perch is that her association with the MLK Center and participation in other civil rights movements were to act as more of a figurehead, than an activist. In short, I don't know of any direct or significant contributions she might have made to civil rights or anything else she might have felt were important. Her most significant achievement, to my knowledge, was to remind us that her husband had been assassinated.
In other words: She married well. Since her husband's assassination, she lived her life to remind us of that fact.
However, to my direct experience with Mrs. King...
I don't remember at all where we were going, but the agent told us that we'd have Mrs. King on board. She arrived and boarded from the ramp, where she'd been driven with police escort right to the plane. She and her aide sat in First Class, with the aide sitting on the aisle. [Tangentially, I've also had Jimmy Carter on a flight. He sat in Coach, and was a very humble passenger.] It was communicated to both myself and the flight attendants that she did not want to be spoken to, in any way. Any needs she might have would be communicated through her aide.
In other words: She didn't want The Help speaking to her at all. She was royalty, and commoners shouldn't speak unless spoken to.
And this is where my opinion gets real ugly...
I also got the impression that all of this were doubly so, if the commoner were white.
So, take that for what it's worth. I'm not a racist in any way. I just don't think she lived a life which warranted the eulogies of 4 Presidents at her funeral.
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
Cartoons...
The 'Muslim Street' is all aflame about a number of cartoons depicting their Prophet Muhammad. I haven't exactly figured out why, but in their view, any depiction is sacrilegious.
I've never really much cared for Thomas Friedman. I think his views are a bit constrained by the same disease which Saul Steinberg depicted so well. However, I've never been able to shake his point that the Global War we're now engaged in amounts to a Clash of Values (and forgive me, but I've been unable to find a citation to his point). The Muslim World values Virtue. They cannot tolerate alcohol, drugs, prostitution, homosexuality, pornography, or any number of "sins". They believe that there is a difference between Right and Wrong, and that they cannot in any way, condone something they view as wrong. They are strikingly intolerant of that which they view as Sin. The Western World values Freedom. We agree with the Muslim world that there are a number of "sins" that should not be accepted. However--and this is where the worlds seperate--we believe that when the choice is freely made to pursue Virtue over Sin, that that choice becomes all the more powerful. The downside is that in order to have this freedom, we have to accept those among us who would not make the same choice. Tolerance is both our Saving and our Achille's Heel. [As an aside, I thought it curious that, in searching for a citation of Friedman's point, I found that he's not exactly viewed well by the Left. However, I digress.]
So, back to the Cartoons...
It occurred to me yesterday that a visual stereotype of 'Muslim Street' is a street demonstration where something is burned...a flag, an Uncle Sam effigy, even the gruesome burning of American bodies (Find the image yourself...I won't post it.).
The Muslims can desecrate something which we value--a flag, an icon, a human being. They can even be all-but-forgiven when Palestinians, while escaping a shootout with Israeli military, take refuge in one of Christianity's most holy sites. But this is the response when something they value is trod upon.
Sorry, but if we have any stones at all, and if we recognize just what is going on here--Friedman's Clash of Values--the Muslim world is going to have to get used to more of the same. And Charlie over at the OC shows that perhaps the Europeans (so far, absent the French) are beginning to shed their Euro-weenie label.
Stephen Green has a post up from an Eastern European correspondent who makes the Piss Christ point--which better illustrates the point I've been feebly trying to make.
I've never really much cared for Thomas Friedman. I think his views are a bit constrained by the same disease which Saul Steinberg depicted so well. However, I've never been able to shake his point that the Global War we're now engaged in amounts to a Clash of Values (and forgive me, but I've been unable to find a citation to his point). The Muslim World values Virtue. They cannot tolerate alcohol, drugs, prostitution, homosexuality, pornography, or any number of "sins". They believe that there is a difference between Right and Wrong, and that they cannot in any way, condone something they view as wrong. They are strikingly intolerant of that which they view as Sin. The Western World values Freedom. We agree with the Muslim world that there are a number of "sins" that should not be accepted. However--and this is where the worlds seperate--we believe that when the choice is freely made to pursue Virtue over Sin, that that choice becomes all the more powerful. The downside is that in order to have this freedom, we have to accept those among us who would not make the same choice. Tolerance is both our Saving and our Achille's Heel. [As an aside, I thought it curious that, in searching for a citation of Friedman's point, I found that he's not exactly viewed well by the Left. However, I digress.]
So, back to the Cartoons...
It occurred to me yesterday that a visual stereotype of 'Muslim Street' is a street demonstration where something is burned...a flag, an Uncle Sam effigy, even the gruesome burning of American bodies (Find the image yourself...I won't post it.).
The Muslims can desecrate something which we value--a flag, an icon, a human being. They can even be all-but-forgiven when Palestinians, while escaping a shootout with Israeli military, take refuge in one of Christianity's most holy sites. But this is the response when something they value is trod upon.
Sorry, but if we have any stones at all, and if we recognize just what is going on here--Friedman's Clash of Values--the Muslim world is going to have to get used to more of the same. And Charlie over at the OC shows that perhaps the Europeans (so far, absent the French) are beginning to shed their Euro-weenie label.
Stephen Green has a post up from an Eastern European correspondent who makes the Piss Christ point--which better illustrates the point I've been feebly trying to make.
Monday, February 06, 2006
Spam...
So, yesterday I caught a bit of news on the radio, which was mostly based on this story. Not that I'm overcome by spam (or email) but, I've noticed an uptick in the volume of spam I've been getting. Coincidence?
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
The Usual Suspects...
Hey. Guess what? The Usual Suspects™ are all a-foam about Bush's SOTU speech last night where they claim Bush...
Ohhh. And Guess what else? They're gonna have a march this upcoming Saturday. I wonder if they'll have some of those Right-on-Stereotype Street-People Puppets?
If you can stand it, the whole thing is here. Scrolling down to the bottom gets you to an unsurprising list of names.
H/T...John over at The Officers' Club.
...spent over the first half of his State of the Union address angrily defending his lying and bloody war in Iraq. He not only verbally attacked those who dissented from this war, he literally had Cindy Sheehan illegally arrested and jailed for wearing an antiwar tee-shirt. Bush brazenly defended his widespread and illegal wiretaps...[Sorry. I couldn't resist emphasising their adjectives.]
Ohhh. And Guess what else? They're gonna have a march this upcoming Saturday. I wonder if they'll have some of those Right-on-Stereotype Street-People Puppets?
If you can stand it, the whole thing is here. Scrolling down to the bottom gets you to an unsurprising list of names.
H/T...John over at The Officers' Club.
Monday, January 30, 2006
Spurs...
Last week I had a layover in Mexico City. Now, in preface, I'm not fond at all of international travel. You have to worry about the water, the food, the language differences. I really don't care about different cultures--understanding my own is complex enough. On past MEX layovers, I've ventured out to a couple of restaurants near the hotel, but other than that, haven't done much.
However, this layover was different. We got directed to an artisan market, which was interesting. Wife of Azlib. would have loved the place. I'm sure she'd have decided to scrap all our current home decorating themes and gone completely Rustic Mexican. Something like this ran the equivalent of $40 instead of the $245 shown at an American re-seller. I was unsuccessful in finding a new brown leather belt to use for Concealed Carry, but I did manage to pick up a necklace and earring set for Valentines Day. I'm finally a hero in the romance department.
We also ran across a Mexican bakery which had good (and cheap!) baked goods. Most other cultures don't have nearly the sweet tooth that Americans have, so we aren't talking about Cinnabon or Dunkin' Donuts here, but good none-the-less. All told, I spent $1.30 on far too many baked goods for one guy to consume.
On my way back, the walk took me past some sort of Federal Police building. As I walked past, I tried to observe (but not too closely) the Federales. Their appearance doesn't exactly inspire confidence in their abilities or their professionalism, but it is a Third World country, so one can't expect too much. One difference between these guys and American LEOs is that all of the armed police that I saw were carrying wheel guns of some sort. I got a kick out of a couple of the guys who carried their extra ammo on old-fashioned cartridge holders...one guy had three different kinds of ammo in his 12 or so cartridge loops.
But the funniest thing had to be their motorcycle cops. It was lunchtime as I was walking back, and a couple of intersections had a motorcycle cop sitting there watching the traffic move through. It probably would have been too provacative for me to do so, but I sort of wished that I'd have had my camera with me. These guys, in addition to their Third-World-Cop authority attitude, and the I'm-A-Different-Breed attitude seen in motorcycle cops everywhere, wore spurs on their tall motorcycle-boots.
However, this layover was different. We got directed to an artisan market, which was interesting. Wife of Azlib. would have loved the place. I'm sure she'd have decided to scrap all our current home decorating themes and gone completely Rustic Mexican. Something like this ran the equivalent of $40 instead of the $245 shown at an American re-seller. I was unsuccessful in finding a new brown leather belt to use for Concealed Carry, but I did manage to pick up a necklace and earring set for Valentines Day. I'm finally a hero in the romance department.
We also ran across a Mexican bakery which had good (and cheap!) baked goods. Most other cultures don't have nearly the sweet tooth that Americans have, so we aren't talking about Cinnabon or Dunkin' Donuts here, but good none-the-less. All told, I spent $1.30 on far too many baked goods for one guy to consume.
On my way back, the walk took me past some sort of Federal Police building. As I walked past, I tried to observe (but not too closely) the Federales. Their appearance doesn't exactly inspire confidence in their abilities or their professionalism, but it is a Third World country, so one can't expect too much. One difference between these guys and American LEOs is that all of the armed police that I saw were carrying wheel guns of some sort. I got a kick out of a couple of the guys who carried their extra ammo on old-fashioned cartridge holders...one guy had three different kinds of ammo in his 12 or so cartridge loops.
But the funniest thing had to be their motorcycle cops. It was lunchtime as I was walking back, and a couple of intersections had a motorcycle cop sitting there watching the traffic move through. It probably would have been too provacative for me to do so, but I sort of wished that I'd have had my camera with me. These guys, in addition to their Third-World-Cop authority attitude, and the I'm-A-Different-Breed attitude seen in motorcycle cops everywhere, wore spurs on their tall motorcycle-boots.
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
The Ignorance of Latte Liberals...
Charlie over at The OC gets it. The Latte Liberals need to get out more.
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Dental Exam...
So, this morning I had my bi-annual dental cleaning and exam. For some, this is a dreaded event, but my teeth aren't terribly sensitive, and as I don't really have any dental problems, I've never thought of this a big deal. None-the-less, it's not exactly a pleasant experience either. Dental picks, sonic cleaners, rubber gloves--What's not to like, right? So, anyway, the dental hygenist I had today was, I'm sure, a very nice woman, but is it any wonder that Hollywood Torturers end up using dental equipment and looking like this?...
However, the torture didn't end there. This nice woman picking and scraping at my teeth did so with her radio set to NPR (via my tax dollars) and the awful cadence of Diane Rehm. I had to endure a discussion of the implications of a conservative winning the race for Prime Minister in Canada (Gasp!).
Oh, the Humanity.
However, the torture didn't end there. This nice woman picking and scraping at my teeth did so with her radio set to NPR (via my tax dollars) and the awful cadence of Diane Rehm. I had to endure a discussion of the implications of a conservative winning the race for Prime Minister in Canada (Gasp!).
Oh, the Humanity.
Thursday, January 19, 2006
Perhaps I'm learning something...
A while back I cursed my poor blogging skillz in the context of not being able to put up a video.
Well, here is an attempt at rectifying that deficiency...
Update: Eureka! It works!
Well, here is an attempt at rectifying that deficiency...
Update: Eureka! It works!
Wednesday, January 18, 2006
McCain as the nice guy...
Vodkapundit uses the "Nice Guy" test in an early handicapping of the '08 race, and in the comments, there's a turn towards McCain as winning the "Nice Guy" race.
McCain as the nice guy? This guy doesn't look all that nice. Nor this guy. And this McCain and this McCain somehow remind me of this guy.
His premise might be right, and of course it'll all be in comparison to whatever villian the D's will nominate, but I have a hard time believing that McCain will ever be able to pull off the "Nice Guy".
McCain as the nice guy? This guy doesn't look all that nice. Nor this guy. And this McCain and this McCain somehow remind me of this guy.
His premise might be right, and of course it'll all be in comparison to whatever villian the D's will nominate, but I have a hard time believing that McCain will ever be able to pull off the "Nice Guy".
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
Small pleasures...
I'm a homeowner with a large lot (1 acre of citrus trees). There's always something to do around the yard. And I've never seen the sense of breaking out a saw when you've got a lot of sawing to do--that's why God let us invent chainsaws. So anyway, over the years, I've collected a fair number of powered yard tools. I've got a riding lawnmower, self-propelled mower (as "back-up" to the rider), gas line-trimmer, gas blower, gas power-washer, gas chipper/shredder, gas roto-tiller, and two gas chainsaws.
However, the problem with accumulating all these tools is that keeping them running becomes a job in itself. They certainly lessen the time I'd have to spend on the chores, but the time required to keep them maintained makes me wonder if I'm getting ahead by having these things.
Well, it didn't take too long in collecting all this stuff before the wise homeowner begins to understand--There are two kinds of power tools: Those you use regularly and those you don't. Since I figured this out some while ago, and I found that "cheap" power tools are more difficult to maintain than expensive ones, I've been buying the best tool I can afford for those that I use regularly (primarily the riding lawnmower, line-trimmer, and blower) and cheaper models for those that I use infrequently.
So, last weekend, I had trimmed 4 trees rather aggressively, and was left with a fairly large pile of brush to get rid of. On my first day of trimming, I filled up my green recycling barrel with trimmings (which was due to be on the curb the following morning), but was left with much more trimmings than could be fit in another barrel.
So, says I: "Time to break out the chipper/shredder."
And imagine my pleasure when on the first pull, the thing starts up and runs like a champ. Filled up a barrel with chippings (which equates to about a 7:1 volume of trimmings), and the only thing I had to worry about was keeping enough (but not too much) gas in the thing to keep it running.
However, balance was restored a couple of days later when my riding mower was displaying a horrible clicking sound as I tried to start it up (probably a weak battery), and I ended up pulling and pulling on the rope to the backup mower before I could finally get it started.
However, the problem with accumulating all these tools is that keeping them running becomes a job in itself. They certainly lessen the time I'd have to spend on the chores, but the time required to keep them maintained makes me wonder if I'm getting ahead by having these things.
Well, it didn't take too long in collecting all this stuff before the wise homeowner begins to understand--There are two kinds of power tools: Those you use regularly and those you don't. Since I figured this out some while ago, and I found that "cheap" power tools are more difficult to maintain than expensive ones, I've been buying the best tool I can afford for those that I use regularly (primarily the riding lawnmower, line-trimmer, and blower) and cheaper models for those that I use infrequently.
So, last weekend, I had trimmed 4 trees rather aggressively, and was left with a fairly large pile of brush to get rid of. On my first day of trimming, I filled up my green recycling barrel with trimmings (which was due to be on the curb the following morning), but was left with much more trimmings than could be fit in another barrel.
So, says I: "Time to break out the chipper/shredder."
And imagine my pleasure when on the first pull, the thing starts up and runs like a champ. Filled up a barrel with chippings (which equates to about a 7:1 volume of trimmings), and the only thing I had to worry about was keeping enough (but not too much) gas in the thing to keep it running.
However, balance was restored a couple of days later when my riding mower was displaying a horrible clicking sound as I tried to start it up (probably a weak battery), and I ended up pulling and pulling on the rope to the backup mower before I could finally get it started.
Tuesday, January 03, 2006
This is a media tragedy...
That shouldn't have happened.
Anyone who has done that party game of passing a message around the room, only to have it completely changed when it comes back to you, miscommunication is a fact of any communications.
However, as someone with no journalism training, perhaps I'm being naive, but wouldn't a responsible journalist have two sources before reporting anything, much less something of this import?
And wouldn't you know it? Geraldo is right at the front of the pack getting everything wrong. "Tell me." "Tell me." "Who's your daddy?"
Anyone who has done that party game of passing a message around the room, only to have it completely changed when it comes back to you, miscommunication is a fact of any communications.
However, as someone with no journalism training, perhaps I'm being naive, but wouldn't a responsible journalist have two sources before reporting anything, much less something of this import?
And wouldn't you know it? Geraldo is right at the front of the pack getting everything wrong. "Tell me." "Tell me." "Who's your daddy?"
Fair Warning...
Given the recent news, all who think they can sneak into this place unscathed had better think again.
Monday, January 02, 2006
Hey Irish! Hey Buckeyes! You Guys Can Party...
Football fans drink Mill Avenue bar dry of 2 beers
Jan. 2, 2006 12:00 AM
The Fiesta Bowl already is a big success long before kickoff. It's hard to imagine, but Rula Bula, an Irish Pub on Mill Avenue in Tempe, actually ran out of bottled beer on New Year's Eve.
"It was a perfect storm," said Steve Goumas, the bar's managing partner. "You have two schools that travel real well" and party as hard as their teams play.
Rula Bula ran out of Bud Light and Coors Light. Suppliers couldn't restock until New Year's Day, when Mill Avenue reopened for traffic after the Tempe Tostitos Fiesta Bowl Block Party, Goumas said.
So who drank more, Ohio State Buckeyes' fans or Notre Dame Fighting Irish fans? Goumas said: "We're an Irish pub, what can you say?"
Source: Arizona Republic
Thursday, December 22, 2005
Geez, Oh Pete....
These guys are scary smart. For me, they're every bit as scary as Freddy Kreuger, LeatherFace, or Jason.
But then, George Bush is pretty scary too.
But then, George Bush is pretty scary too.
Friday, December 09, 2005
Connecting a couple of dots...
Dot 1. President of Iran says: Move Israel to Europe
Dot 2. A portion of the welcoming committee. (h/t INDC-dorkafork)
Note: I am not, in any way an anti-Semite, nor am I suggesting that moving Israel to Europe would generate widespread anti-semitism there (in spite of the increased Islamic immigration there). My point is that thinking of the fringe, nutcase elements who would put up a JUDEN sign at a soccer match is completely present in the thinking of the President of Iran.
BTW, I might have some minor quibbles with their thinking, but these guys make an interesting case that a war with Iran is looming.
Dot 2. A portion of the welcoming committee. (h/t INDC-dorkafork)
Note: I am not, in any way an anti-Semite, nor am I suggesting that moving Israel to Europe would generate widespread anti-semitism there (in spite of the increased Islamic immigration there). My point is that thinking of the fringe, nutcase elements who would put up a JUDEN sign at a soccer match is completely present in the thinking of the President of Iran.
BTW, I might have some minor quibbles with their thinking, but these guys make an interesting case that a war with Iran is looming.
Thursday, December 08, 2005
Saturday, December 03, 2005
It's less than a year to the midterms, and....
Just what do the Democrats think about the War in Iraq?...
John Murtha Pull out to someplace nearby. Do it sooner rather than later. And on a 6 month deadline.
Nancy Pelosi Just get out.
Her deputy, Steny Hoyer Leaving "could lead to disaster, spawning a civil war, fostering a haven for terrorists and damaging our nation's security and credibility." [Which sounds surprisingly like what Bush is saying.]
Hillary Clinton I'm for the war, but Bush has screwed it up royally, and we ought to let the UN do something about WMDs.
John Kerry Huh?
Joe Lieberman Does America have a good plan...for victory in Iraq? Yes we do.
On another forum, I said to a democratic-leaning reader...
Kerry lost because he couldn’t escape the label of being a “flip-flopper”. He made himself famous by being an anti-war activist-turned politician, and then tried to make America believe that these were credentials sufficient for him to become a Wartime President. He “voted for the War before he voted against it.”
The Democratic Party is collectively today doing what Kerry did as a candidate: Flip-flopping. Iraqi regime change became American policy in 1998 on a 97-2 vote in the Senate (as well as signed into law by Clinton). In 2002, the Congress “authorized [the President] to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate...” to pull Saddam out of power and to enforce the UN resolutions [emphasis added]. And, last week the House overwhelmingly voted down the idea that we should withdraw immediately.
Yet we continue to hear the Biden/Pelosi/Reed/Murtha/Sheehan crowd crow over and over that we ought to get out. What Democrats really ought to do is to get down on their knees and beg someone like Zell Miller, Ed Koch, or even Joe Lieberman to be their standard-bearer. Take the foreign policy issue away from the Republicans and force the debate to focus on domestic issues. You guys can win on domestic policy. The Republicans will cream you if you insist (again) on staying out of a war that our enemy has decided we’re in.
Does the above cartoon (lifted from the NY Post) not depict where the Democrats are today? Nowhere.
Friday, December 02, 2005
Just checking in...
Like everyone, I've been distracted by the Thanksgiving activities, as well as being involved in a rather in-depth forum discussion elsewhere. Son-of-Azlib and I were able to make it to the range last Friday. I've got a nice video, but damn my poor blogging skillz, I haven't been able to find how to put up a link.
Thursday, November 17, 2005
Ha!! I am William Wallace!!!
Roll your "R's" when you speak around here, lassie!
Which Action Hero Would You Be? v. 2.0
created with QuizFarm.com
 |
| You scored as William Wallace. The great Scottish warrior William Wallace led his people against their English oppressors in a campaign that won independence for Scotland and immortalized him in the hearts of his countrymen. With his warrior's heart, tactician's mind, and poet's soul, Wallace was a brilliant leader. He just wanted to live a simple life on his farm, but he gave it up to help his country in its time of need. |
Which Action Hero Would You Be? v. 2.0
created with QuizFarm.com
Why isn't Chris spitting at the camera?
I don't watch nearly as much of Chris Matthews as I once did. He used to have a fairly balanced show, but has drifted pretty much completely off the left edge of things. His recent quest, of course, has been the 'Scooter' Libby indictment. Matthews appears to enjoy the way "Scooter" falls off his tongue, and has been all verklempt at the idea that ethics problems exist in the Bush White House (and specifically among the Vice President's staff).
So, now that Bob Woodward has said to Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald that he was aware of Plame's CIA employment a month before it was supposedly leaked to the press as a way to punish Joe Wilson for his scathing critique of the reasons for the war, many are saying that these charges may have to be dropped. Fitzgerald has boxed himself in with this statement...
Now, my question is: Why isn't Chris spitting at the camera at the idea that many are saying that these indictments will be dropped? He sure seems to be still wondering who did something wrong.
So, now that Bob Woodward has said to Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald that he was aware of Plame's CIA employment a month before it was supposedly leaked to the press as a way to punish Joe Wilson for his scathing critique of the reasons for the war, many are saying that these charges may have to be dropped. Fitzgerald has boxed himself in with this statement...
"He was at the beginning of the chain of phone calls, the first official to disclose this information outside the government to a reporter. And then he lied about it afterwards, under oath and repeatedly."
Now, my question is: Why isn't Chris spitting at the camera at the idea that many are saying that these indictments will be dropped? He sure seems to be still wondering who did something wrong.
Thursday, November 10, 2005
Who Lied?
Norman Podhoretz has written a thoroughly researched essay putting down the meme that Bush Lied!
Happy Birthday, Devil Dogs
Lifted shamelessly from someplace I won't admit to...
President Bush May Send Up To 5 Marines For French Assistance
President Bush has authorized the Joint Chiefs to begin drawing
up a battle plan to pull France's ass out of the fire again. Facing an
apparent overwhelming force of up to 400 pissed off teenagers Mr.
Bush doubts France's ability to hold off the little pissants. "Hell, if
the last two world wars are any indication, I would expect France
to surrender any day now", said Bush.
Joint Chiefs head, Gen. Peter Pace, warned the President that it
might be necessary to send up to 5 Marines to get things under
control. The General admitted that 5 Marines may be overkill but
he wanted to get this thing under control within 24 hours of them
arriving on scene.
He stated he was having a hard time finding even one Marine to
help those ungrateful bastards out for a third time but thought he
could persuade a few women Marines to do the job before they go
on pregnancy leave.
President Bush asked Gen. Pace to get our Marines out of there as
soon as possible after order was restored. He also reminded Gen.
Pace to make sure the Marines did not take soap, deodorant, or
razors with them. The less they stand out the better.
Notice...
For my few and largely spamming commenters...
I have now turned on "Word Verification". You'll have to manually copy a word to make a comment.
Since I have few other viewers or commenters, it shouldn't slow things down too much.
I have now turned on "Word Verification". You'll have to manually copy a word to make a comment.
Since I have few other viewers or commenters, it shouldn't slow things down too much.
Tuesday, November 08, 2005
Monday, November 07, 2005
Damn my poor computer skillz...
I just watched the local NBC station air a MSNBC story (reported by ? Handlesman) on the CIA prison kerfluffle currently going on. I wanted to post a screen capture of a map they put up showing the supposed locations of these prisons. Anyhoo, I could swear that the arrow labeled "Afghanistan" was pointing to Somalia. If I get time, I'll try to find this and get it up here.
Saturday, November 05, 2005
I see a connection here...
Regarding the rioting going on in France recently, there is obviously a lefty-media agenda to skip right on by the fact that these are young Muslims who are rioting (Do I dare call them 'Young Turks'?).
However, I think there is another connection. They are from a demographic with a high unemployment rate. As much as I think these nutcases are more of the problem than the solution, they point me to a parallel to the Watts riots of 1965.
The French social state has obviously contributed to their lack of jobs. Anytime the government will guarantee something for little to no work--and tax their public to support this guarantee--is it surprising to anyone that jobs are lost and people are incented to not work? This breeds the hopelessness that is evidenced by the riots. Throwing money at the problem only exacerbates the problem. Getting rid of their socialist form of thinking is their only long-term hope.
However, I think there is another connection. They are from a demographic with a high unemployment rate. As much as I think these nutcases are more of the problem than the solution, they point me to a parallel to the Watts riots of 1965.
In 1965 Black unemployment in the U.S. was 9%, but unemployment in Watts was 31%. Los Angeles joined the ranks of cities all over the country - Newark, New York, Las Vegas, Detroit - where riots had broken out over political and social issues.
The French social state has obviously contributed to their lack of jobs. Anytime the government will guarantee something for little to no work--and tax their public to support this guarantee--is it surprising to anyone that jobs are lost and people are incented to not work? This breeds the hopelessness that is evidenced by the riots. Throwing money at the problem only exacerbates the problem. Getting rid of their socialist form of thinking is their only long-term hope.
Wednesday, October 05, 2005
Where is the new Barry Goldwater?
If the Republicans could find their present-day Barry Goldwater, they could absolutely clean up politically. But they persist in their present mold of being only slightly less corrupt than the Democrats, and every bit as willing to freely spend our money.
Is there not someone out there who can speak these truths today?
Is there not someone out there who can speak these truths today?
A little catching up...
I said earlier that I'd get to something about the atrocious Kelo decision, and frankly had forgotten about it.
So, today I run across this little gem, which exemplifies just where my fears might take us. H/T Sharp as a Marble, via Ace.
Ammo? Oh, yeah. I've got ammo.
[BTW, sorry for the scarcity of posting as of late. I've run into a bankruptcy at work (and the resultant questions of "What will we do if the company goes under?", extra work at home, and a general lack of motivation for this thing. We'll see if I can keep it going.]
So, today I run across this little gem, which exemplifies just where my fears might take us. H/T Sharp as a Marble, via Ace.
Ammo? Oh, yeah. I've got ammo.
[BTW, sorry for the scarcity of posting as of late. I've run into a bankruptcy at work (and the resultant questions of "What will we do if the company goes under?", extra work at home, and a general lack of motivation for this thing. We'll see if I can keep it going.]
Friday, September 09, 2005
She overwhelmed her...
As we watched the first reports after Katrina hit New Orleans, and the levees were overtopped, I said to my wife (after watching a brief press conference with Gov. Blanco), that she was totally in over her head. I could see it in her eyes.
So, (via the Puppy Blender) I see that even the NYT is reporting the same. She dithered and delayed until the damages were too much to control.
The article includes a very subtle cutting quote at women executives...
Now I'll accept (without knowing) that Gov. Blanco is a good administrator and that this is important in an Executive, but the message I'm getting here is this: Elect a woman and you risk getting someone not capable of handling an emergency. It is clear that Gov. Blanco did not perform her responsibilites as she should have, and that the suffering and death are partly her fault. [And I won't even begin to speak about that complete idiot, Mayor Nagin.] There are certainly women politicians who would have done better than Gov. Blanco (Hillary! and my midget dyke-governor come to mind), and equally, there are touchy-feely male politicians who one might expect would perform at least as badly as Gov. Blanco. But the differences in character of women who are care-givers and compassionate, verses the character of men who are problem-solvers and leaders cannot be dismissed here.
So, (via the Puppy Blender) I see that even the NYT is reporting the same. She dithered and delayed until the damages were too much to control.
The article includes a very subtle cutting quote at women executives...
"Can you imagine how it would have been perceived if a president of the United States of one party had pre-emptively taken from the female governor of another party the command and control of her forces, unless the security situation made it completely clear that she was unable to effectively execute her command authority and that lawlessness was the inevitable result?" asked one senior administration official, who spoke anonymously because the talks were confidential. [emphasis mine]
Now I'll accept (without knowing) that Gov. Blanco is a good administrator and that this is important in an Executive, but the message I'm getting here is this: Elect a woman and you risk getting someone not capable of handling an emergency. It is clear that Gov. Blanco did not perform her responsibilites as she should have, and that the suffering and death are partly her fault. [And I won't even begin to speak about that complete idiot, Mayor Nagin.] There are certainly women politicians who would have done better than Gov. Blanco (Hillary! and my midget dyke-governor come to mind), and equally, there are touchy-feely male politicians who one might expect would perform at least as badly as Gov. Blanco. But the differences in character of women who are care-givers and compassionate, verses the character of men who are problem-solvers and leaders cannot be dismissed here.
Thursday, September 08, 2005
A New Look...
You'll notice the new look of these premises. I wasn't really happy with the lack of contrast between the color of a link and my background. This template is kind of plain, but solves that problem.
Wednesday, September 07, 2005
Another new favorite...
Gotta remember how to put someone over in the sidebar. Cold Fury deserves a place of honor.
Update: Done.
Update: Done.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)