- Obama's Military Tribunals- "Their champion has repudiated them once again"
- Critics Still Haven't Read the 'Torture' Memos-
"Congress required, in order for there to be a violation of the law, that an interrogator specifically intend that the detainee suffer prolonged physical or mental suffering as a result of the prohibited conduct. Just knowing a person could be injured from the interrogation method is not a violation under Supreme Court rulings interpreting "specific intent" in other criminal statutes."
There's that "specific intent" thingi which I noted that Scott at Powerline and Andrew McCarthy made mention of here. That "specific"--as opposed to "general"--intent concept makes a difference.
And, Oh-By-The-Way, I love the scare quote around "torture" in the title. - Panetta's Pelosi Smackdown-"Mrs. Pelosi is now caught in a humiliation of her own design that will only escalate if she insists on an interrogation 'truth commission.'" As I said the other day on That-Forum-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named, the typical congresscritter--anc certainly Mrs. Pelosi--wouldn't know the truth if it were a cluebat applied directly to their foreheads.
It doesn't matter where you end up.
Sometimes, it just feels good to be off that damned road.
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Wholesale.....
Linkerage....
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment